2401612

Hach Presence/Absence Test with MUG

Hach Presence/Absence Test with MUG

Description

Hach's Presence/Absence Broth (MUG) Disposable Bottles provide an easy-to-use test, ideal for screening drinking water samples for the presence of Total Coliforms and E. coli bacteria.

Features

  • EPA accepted Presence-Absence bottles and media
  • Color change to yellow or yellow brown indicates presence of coliform bacteria
  • Screen drinking water samples for the presence of Total Coliforms and E. coli bacteria
Your Price
$61.79
Drop ships from manufacturer

Shipping Information
Return Policy
Why Buy From Fondriest?

Details

P/A Broth with MUG allows simultaneous detection of total coliform bacteria and E. coli. In addition to the lactose and lauryl tryptose broths with bromcresol purple, this medium contains MUG reagent (4-methylumbelliferyl-b-D-glucuronide). The MUG reagent produces a fluorogenic product when hydrolyzed by glucuronidase (an enzyme specific to E. coli). MUG detects non gasproducing (anaerogenic) strains of E. coli and works well when competitive organisms are present.

 

Combine 100 mL of sample and P/A Broth with MUG, incubate for 24 hours and check for a color change and fluorescence. A yellow color indicates the presence of total coliforms. To detect E. coli, examine samples under a long-wave ultraviolet (UV) light. Fluorescence indicates the presence of E. coli.

What's Included:
  • (12) Hach Presence/Absence Broth (MUG) Disposable Bottles
Image Part # Product Description Price Stock Order
Hach Presence/Absence Test with MUG 2401612 Presence/Absence test with MUG, pack of 12
$61.79
Drop ships from manufacturer
Hach Presence/Absence Test with MUG 2401650 Presence/Absence test with MUG, pack of 50
$266.00
Drop ships from manufacturer

Questions & Answers

| Ask a Question
Can we perform an indole test instead of using UV light for confirmation?
This test is designed to use florescence as an indicator of bacteria. The indole test requires Kovac's reagent, which is not included with this item.

Related Products

In The News

Guardians of the Riverbank: Planting Trees to Protect Water Quality and Wildlife

In fall of 2017, the Connecticut River Conservancy (CRC) along with their project partners improved more than 9,000 feet of riverbank by planting 5,690 native trees and shrubs to protect the Connecticut River and its tributaries. The trees now guard against erosion and pollution on seven farms in New Hampshire and Vermont, and expand the existing habitat for local wildlife. This kind of project is part of CRC's core work. In August of 2011, Hurricane Irene roared up the East Coast of the United States, leaving a tell-tale path of destruction behind. Listed as the eighth-costliest hurricane in American history, the storm also hurt the watershed of the Connecticut River.

Read More

University of Toronto Doctoral Student Sees Environmental Monitoring Future in Internet of Things

Researchers face many difficulties. Assessing the ecological health of large geographic regions, especially those with a low population and few research facilities, is one of the many challenges scientists face. One such region is the Ottawa River in Canada, nearly 800 miles long with an overall drainage area of 55,000 square miles. Not only is it vast, but there are few human inhabitants and few research outposts. While gathering representative water samples in such a region is difficult enough, there is also the challenge of responding in a timely manner when problems arise.

Read More

Minnesota Water Quality Certification Program Encourages Sustainable Farming Practices

According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , agriculture is the leading probable source of impairments to assessed streams and rivers in the United States, and the third probable source to lakes. Agricultural impairments, typically considered nonpoint source pollution, include irrigation and stormwater runoff that carries animal waste, bacteria, fertilizer, naturally occurring metals, nutrients, pesticides, excess salt, and sediment. Unfortunately, this has at times positioned farmers—a group which has the most to gain from water quality initiatives—at odds with environmental agencies and scientists.

Read More