USGS details 2009 dye tracer tracking of Rotenone plume aimed at Asian carp

By on February 13, 2014
Silver Carp (Credit: D. O'Keefe, Michigan Sea Grant)

In December 2009, an underwater electric barrier thought to be the last line of defense between Asian carp and the Great Lakes was shut down for maintenance. With recent DNA evidence suggesting that carp may be nearby and no backup barrier yet in place, state and federal environmental agencies descended on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and coordinated one of the nation’s largest-ever applications of a commercial fish poison.

The a multiagency task force led by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources injected 1,800 gallons of Rotenone into the canal that day to wipe out every fish in a 6-mile reach downstream of the barrier. But just important as killing any potential Asian carp was making sure that the poison didn’t drift beyond the downstream end of the treatment reach.

“It could have devastating effects on all the fisheries downstream,” said Ryan Jackson, a hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey’s Illinois Water Science Center and one of the scientists on the scene. “If they put that Rotenone in and didn’t deactivate it properly before it reaches downstream, it could kill fish hundreds of miles downstream all the way through the Illinois River and down to Peoria, or even further depending on concentrations and dilutions.”

To help the DNR track the rotenone, the USGS laced the poison plume with a tracer dye and monitored its progress downstream with bankside and boat-mounted fluorometers. That let crews at stations along the canal know when the Rotenone had arrived and that it was time apply a chemical — potassium permanganate — that neutralizes the poison.

The DNR maintained a steady injection of Rotenone through a pipe installed just upstream of the barrier. Just downstream of that site, the USGS began pumping Rhodamine WT dye into the canal 10 minutes before the poison application began and continued until 10 minutes after the Rotenone stopped flowing. With the plume encased in dye, real-time data from fluorometers could signal treated water.

One of the fluorometer-equipped vessels used to track the Rotenone plume (Credit: J. Dunker/USGS)

One of the fluorometer-equipped vessels used to track the Rotenone plume (Credit: J. Dunker/USGS)

The fluorometer setup included six instruments installed at fixed locations approximately every mile along the treatment reach. Two boats also carried sensors, one roaming the canal and continuously mapping the plume, while the other leapfrogged ahead of the plume and waited for it’s arrival and strategic locations. Those included additional Rotenone injection sites along the canal to boost concentrations as the plume progressed and became diluted.

The plume took more than 30 hours to move through the treatment reach. Jackson was on the water the whole time.

“I was on the rover boat for a wonderful 35-hour shift,” Jackson said. “It was a long time, but it was a dataset that we weren’t willing to have a break in.”

Part of that job was navigate among boats from multiple agencies equipped with nets to clean up the inevitable results of an effective Rotenone application.

“There were close to 40 boats on the water picking up fish,” Jackson said. “They were floating already. Doesn’t take long.”

A dye plume visible in the Little Calumet River, the site of a second Rotenone application in 2010 (Credit: Ryan Jackson)

A dye plume visible in the Little Calumet River, the site of a second Rotenone application in 2010 (Credit: Ryan Jackson)

The agency recently released a report describing their methods and results of the 2009 application, as well as a similar effort in 2010 on the Little Calumet River.

“The hope is that this report that we’ve written will allow others to utilize the same kind of technology to be able to apply these kind of piscicides in a more more environmentally responsible way, where you can track it at all times and you reduce any collateral damage to fisheries.”

Top image: Silver Carp (Credit: D. O’Keefe, Michigan Sea Grant)

About Jeff Gillies

Jeff Brooks-Gillies has written about science, energy and the environment for going on 10 years. He's a native Michigander who, after a stint in Colorado, lives in Indianapolis with his wife and two kids.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.