Saugeye (Walleye-Sauger Hybrid)

Saugeye

For additional information visit the Ohio Division of Wildlife Fish Identification web page.


Scientific Name: Stizostedion vitreum X Stizostedion canadense

Common Name: Saugeye

Saugeye Interesting Facts

  • Saugeye are a hybrid created by crossing a female walleye with a male sauger

  • Saugeye are a member of the perch family (Percidae)

  • The Ohio state record saugeye weighed 12.84 pounds and was caught at Alum Creek Reservoir near Columbus

  • Saugeye are stocked by a handful of states around the Midwest to create angling opportunities

  • Saugeye eat mostly gizzard shad, shiners and yellow perch in Ohio reservoirs

Saugeye Distribution and Identification

Saugeye are a naturally occurring hybrid in water bodies that have reproducing populations of both walleye and sauger.  Trautman (1981) suggested that in water bodies with walleye and sauger a hybridization rate of about 2-3% could be expected.  Billington et al. (1997) found that 4.1% of all Stizostedion (walleye, sauger and saugeye) sampled in the Illinois river were saugeye.  The sites sampled in the study had not been stocked and were sustained through natural reproduction.

In the 1980's state DNR's around the Midwest began experimenting with stocking saugeye as a sportfish in reservoirs and rivers. Throughout the 1960's and 70's walleye were stocked with little success in turbid, structure deficient reservoirs.  In the late 70's it was discovered that saugeye not only survive better than walleye in reservoir habitats, they also grow faster and are more easily caught by anglers.  Most likely a phenomenon known as "hybrid vigor" can explain the hybrid saugeye's aggressive feeding behaviors.  Saugeye were immediately popular with anglers, and state's such as Ohio began replacing walleye with yearly stockings of saugeye.

Saugeye look similar to both parental species.  Saugeye are best identified by their "blotchy" saddle markings on their side and back similar to sauger, but saugeye usually have white pigment on the lower portion of their tail along with dark blotches on their dorsal fin membrane.  Identification of saugeye can be difficult in water bodies that have all three Stizostedion species, such as the Ohio River, but if it is possible to directly compare the three species at one time identification is much easier.  Ohio, along with most other states that stock saugeye, does not stock both saugeye and walleye in any reservoir.  To find out which species is stocked in your favorite water body check with your local DNR office.

Saugeye Biology

There is little doubt that saugeye stockings in reservoirs provide for better sportfishing than walleye stockings.  Most reservoir systems lack the necessary water clarity and habitat required to support self-sustaining walleye populations.  Stocking programs tend to be very costly when the time and effort needed to produce, raise and stock fingerlings is taken into consideration.  When it became apparent that the sportfishing return was marginal for certain reservoirs stocked with walleye, stocking saugeye became an attractive option.  Saugeye provided many benefits when compared to walleye.  Saugeye generally are easier to rear than walleye, and as mentioned earlier, survive and grow better in reservoir systems.  When creel surveys proved that saugeye were also easier to catch it seemed that stocking saugeye was the solution to provide better angling.

As early as the mid-1980's biologists began to notice an unexpected consequence of the saugeye stocking programs.  It was originally assumed that saugeye would be sterile, because they are a hybrid species.  Unfortunately, research projects started clearly documenting not only saugeye X walleye reproduction, but also saugeye X saugeye reproduction.  Johnson et al. (1988) found that male saugeye crossed with female walleye resulted in 10% hatching success of second-generation hybrids.  Fiss et al. (1997) not only documented walleye X saugeye reproduction, but also found saugeye X saugeye reproduction in Normandy Reservoir, TN.

Considering all of the potential genetic impacts associated with stocking saugeye, why do some states continue to stock them?  For saugeye to have any impact on native populations of walleye and sauger, they must come into contact with them.  By considering factors such as connectivity with other watersheds and presence of walleye and sauger, it is still possible to create great saugeye fisheries in situations where the risk for reproduction with parental species is low.  For example, in Ohio, upground reservoirs and central Ohio reservoirs are stocked heavily with saugeye, but realistically those fish will never come into contact with native fish.  The upground reservoirs are completely isolated from their water source, and central Ohio reservoirs are over 100 km from the Ohio River in most cases.  While anglers stocking saugeye that they caught into other water bodies is always a risk, by cautiously selecting waters for yearly stockings state DNR's can create saugeye fishing opportunities without harming native fish populations.

For more information about saugeye, see these interesting pages:

  • Ohio Division of Wildlife, saugeye information page.

  • Kansas Wildlife and Parks, saugeye stocking page.

  • Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, saugeye and walleye page.

References Cited:

Billington, N., R. C. Brooks and R. C. Heidinger. 1997. Frequency and natural hybridization between saugers and walleyes in the
    Peoria Pool of the Illinois River, as determined by morphological and electrophoretic criteria.  North American Journal of Fisheries
    Management 17: 220-224.

Fiss, F. C., S. M. Sammons, P. W. Bettoli and N. Billington. 1997. Reproduction among saugeyes (Fx hybrids) and walleyes in
    Normandy Reservoir, Tennessee.  North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17: 215-219.

Johnson, B. L., D. L. Smith and R. F. Carline. 1988. Habitat preferences, survival, growth, foods, and harvest of walleyes and walleye X
    sauger hybrids. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 8: 292-304.

Trautman, M. B. 1981. The fishes of Ohio (2nd edition). The Ohio State University Press. Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Article By:
Travis Hartman, Fondriest Environmental, October 2002

Email