Zebra-Tech Seapoint Fluorometer Hydro-Wiper

The Self-contained Zebra-Tech Seapoint Fluorometer Hydro-Wiper is a field-proven, high performance wiping system designed for the Seapoint fluorometers.

Features

  • Highly effective brush technology for both marine and fresh water
  • Precision on-board clock for accurate wipe interval timing
  • Simple sensor installation and operation with user-replaceable brush
Your Price $1,676.00
Usually ships in 1-2 weeks
Zebra-Tech
Free Lifetime Tech SupportFree Lifetime Tech Support
Free Ground ShippingFree Ground Shipping
ImagePart#Product DescriptionPriceStockOrder
Zebra-Tech Seapoint Fluorometer Hydro-WiperSPT-01-SC-30 Self-contained Hydro-Wiper for Seapoint fluorometer, 30m depth rating
$1,676.00
Usually ships in 1-2 weeks
Zebra-Tech Seapoint Fluorometer Hydro-Wiper SPT-01-SC-100 Self-contained Hydro-Wiper for Seapoint fluorometer, 100m depth rating
$2,200.00
Usually ships in 1-2 weeks
Zebra-Tech Seapoint Fluorometer Hydro-Wiper
SPT-01-SC-30
Self-contained Hydro-Wiper for Seapoint fluorometer, 30m depth rating
Usually ships in 1-2 weeks
$1,676.00
Zebra-Tech Seapoint Fluorometer Hydro-Wiper
SPT-01-SC-100
Self-contained Hydro-Wiper for Seapoint fluorometer, 100m depth rating
Usually ships in 1-2 weeks
$2,200.00
The Zebra-Tech Seapoint Fluorometer Hydro-Wiper is a mechanical wiper system designed to fit easily to the Seapoint Fluorometer. Using a regular gentle brushing action, the Hydro-Wiper keeps the optical window of the Seapoint Fluorometer clean from bio-fouling and other unwanted deposits such as mud. The Hydro-Wiper reduces the need for costly site visits to manually clean the instrument, maintaining data integrity throughout long deployments.
  • (1) Zebra-Tech Seapoint Fluorometer Hydro-Wiper self-contained system
  • (1) Field kit
  • (1) Operations manual
Questions & Answers
No Questions
Please, mind that only logged in users can submit questions

In The News

Is eradicating Great Lakes sea lamprey an “impossible dream?” Researchers say no

The sea lamprey’s days in the Great Lakes could be numbered. That’s according to one researcher who took one of the first scientific looks at the possibility of sea lamprey eradication in the Great Lakes. So, can you remove enough sea lamprey to make them disappear? “Well the answer is we already have,” said Michael Jones, emeritus professor of fisheries and wildlife at Michigan State University. “Then there’s the obvious question: Why are they still here?”  While multiple gaps in current management techniques, like sea lamprey poisons called lampricides, could account for sea lamprey’s persistence in the Great Lakes, new technology could help sea lamprey managers eliminate inaccessible populations.

Read More

America’s Elusive Crayfish and the eDNA that’s Finding Them

The Shasta crayfish and signal crayfish are two similar looking arthropods on two very different ecological trajectories. As one spreads in abundance, originating in the Pacific Northwest and spreading throughout the world, the other has been reduced to a handful of remaining populations spread throughout one river and its tributaries.  Pacifastacus leniusculus - the signal crayfish - has met few obstacles in its widely successful expansion from the Pacific Northwest southward in California and Nevada, as well as Europe and Japan. By some expert accounts, it has reached invader status. And while invasive species are rarely good for the surrounding food webs, it’s Pacifastacus fortis - the Shasta crayfish - that’s suffered the most at the signal crayfish’s fortune.

Read More

Low Tech, Low Cost Buoys Coming to Maine’s Shellfish Farmers

What might the Maine Aquaculture Innovation Center’ s (MAIC) buoy offer that other governments and university monitoring equipment lack? The center doesn’t have MicroCAT recorders or autonomous acoustic sensing gliders. It’s not deploying hundred-thousand-dollar oceanographic mooring lines gathering massive amounts of data. So what can MAIC’s three-foot prototype buoy offer that others can’t? It’s easy to clean and costs very little. “One of the big issues for putting anything in the water is biofouling,” said Josh Girgis, an engineer at MAIC based at the University of Maine’s Darling Marine Center (DMC). “If you put a sensor in, you can only expect it to work until something starts growing on it.

Read More